How it works
Follow topics, not shows.
First
Pick your topics
Creatine, sleep, Zone 2, GLP-1s, longevity — whatever you're actually trying to figure out.
Then
We read everything
Every credible podcast, newsletter, and video — transcribed, and every claim pulled out and traced back to who said it.
Each week
You get the pith
One short digest of what's worth hearing on your topics — cited, in context, and nothing you didn't need.
Anatomy of an entry
What one entry looks like.
Every topic, distilled across every source that covered it this week — so you can see who's saying what, and where they disagree.
Creatine
Broad agreement that 5 g/day is the well-supported baseline for muscle and strength. The newer thread is cognition — two sources discussed 10 g+ for the brain, but framed it as early, not settled. One dissent on loading phases.
What was said
5 g/day monohydrate reliably improves strength and power output.
meta-analysisLayne Norton · Huberman Lab · 1:14:22
10–12 g/day may support cognition; muscle saturates near 5 g.
early / single studyGabrielle Lyon · The Drive · 0:42:09
One source still recommends a 20 g/day loading week — most others now say it's unnecessary.
disputedguest · Mind Pump · 0:58:41
Build your digest
Tap the topics you care about.
This is roughly what your weekly Pith would look like. Add or remove topics and watch it change.
Why it's different
Not "AI summaries." A scout, not a judge.
Context, not verdicts
Every claim shows what the source based it on — a meta-analysis, one early study, or a personal hunch. You decide what to make of it.
Across every format
Audio, newsletters, and video in one place — not a podcast tool or an inbox tool. All of it.
Agreement and dissent
See where sources line up — and, more interesting, exactly where they don't.